Hilde Drivenes Johannessen
Birgitte Kleivset
University
of Agder, Norway
This paper presents results from a case study of community building practices on Twitter in eight
Norwegian University Libraries, using a combination of a qualitative and a
quantitative approach. The analysis aims to highlight how academic libraries tweet
content that may build a community with two-way communication and engagement
with researchers and students. Our research also sheds light on recent developments
and current challenges in University Libraries use of Twitter in theory and
practice, and give some critical perspectives on information literacy and digital library community engagement.
Methodology
The dataset for this research is collected from the twitter timelines
of eight norwegian university libraries with a presence at Twitter. This is
public available data. In addition to tweet content, the frequency of
favoritemarking, retweets, answeres and hashtags are retrieved. There will also
be a cathegorization of the group each of the libraries have chosen to follow.
Using five principles of Social Media Optimization (SMO), defined in
the study “Social media optimization: making library content shareable and
engaging” by Doralyn Rossmann and Scott W.H. Young (2015) the objectives will
be analyzed accordingly:
(1) Create sharable content
(2) Make sharing easy
(3) Reward engagement
(4) Proactively share
(5) Encourage use
These principles has been modified and updated from Bhargavas (2006,
2010) established principles of SMO (Rossmann and Young, 529:2015b), we will
apply and modify these concepts into eight norwegiean university libraries use
of Twitter as a community building network. The outcome of this research is
expected to give insight into effective community building methods and techniques for use in the university
library community on Twitter.
Keywords
library community building, engagement, social media, emerging technologies, information literacy, twitter
library community building, engagement, social media, emerging technologies, information literacy, twitter
Bibliography
Bhargava, R. (2006) “5 rules of social media optimization (SMO)” Influential Marketing Blog, available at
http://www.rohitbhargava.com/2006/08/5_rules_of_soci.html
Bhargava, R. (2010) “The 5 new rules of social media optimization
(SMO)” Influential Marketing Blog,
available at http://www.rohitbhargava.com/2010/08/the-5-new-rules-of-social-media-optimization-smo.html
Palmer, S. (2014) “ Characterizing University Library Use of Social
Media: A Case Study of Twitter and Facebook from Australia. The Journal of Academic Librarianship.
Vol. 40. p. 611-619.
Vosoughi, S. and Roy, D. (2016) “Tweet
Acts: A Speech Act Classifier for Twitter.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI
Conference on Web and Social Media. Cologne. Germany.
Young, S.W.H. and Rossmann, D. (2015a). ”Building Library Community
Through Social Media.” Information
Technology and Libraries. Vol.34. No.1. p. 20-37.
Young, S.W.H. and Rossmann, D. (2015b). ”Social media optimization:
making library content shareable and engaging.” Library Hi Tech. Vol. 33. No. 4. p. 526-544.
Zhao, WX, Jiang, J, Wng, J, He, J, Lim, EP, Yan, H and Li, X. (2011).
”Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models.” Paper presented
at the Advances in Information Retrieval:
33rd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR, Dulin. Ireland.
Ingen kommentarer:
Legg inn en kommentar